Designing and planning learning activities and programmes of study
Students working together
Introduction
The academic experience of most international students in their home countries differs widely from that which they encounter in the UK, and this difference starts to be felt at the base level of course and learning activity design and presentation. The planning and design of courses and learning activities is the first area addressed in the UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education (PDF 167KB), and is the keystone of good academic practice.
These activities will explore the process of course design typically followed in UK universities, and encourage reflection on possible implications of the outcomes of this process on students who are new to this culture of learning.
Each section has a Portfolio Activity associated with it that can be incorporated into a portfolio for personal or assessment purposes. There is also a Linking Activity which synthesises the 3 portfolio activities from each section.
Objectives
• To examine the first area of activity in the UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education.
• To explore how international students can be introduced to the expectations of new cultures of learning.
• To build up a model of reflective practice concerning support for international students.
Activity 1: The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001
For this activity you will consider the ways in which learning outcomes are used to describe knowledge, understanding and skills (for employment).
Instruction
Look at the tabular representation of the QAA framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland which uses five levels to describe a rising scale of knowledge/understanding and a rising scale of employability qualities. Now consider the knowledge, understanding and abilities that students are typically expected to have at each level and decide which descriptor best fits the level given.
The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001
1 Certificate ------- C level ---- Certificates of Higher Education
2 Intermediate ----- I level ---- Foundation degrees, ordinary (Bachelors) degrees, Diplomas of Higher Education and other higher diplomas
3 Honours ---------- H level ---- Bachelors degrees with Honours, Graduate Certificates and Graduate Diplomas
4 Masters ---------- M level ---- Masters degrees, Postgraduate Certificates and Postgraduate Diplomas
5 Doctoral ---------- D level ---- Doctorates
Certificate (C) level: Certificate of Higher Education
Show feedback
Hide feedback
2. an ability to apply underlying concepts and principles outside the context in which they were first studied, including, where appropriate, the application of those principles in an employment context
Statement 1 is taken from Intermediate (I) level which looks for the transferability of skills and knowledge acquired as opposed to the ability to describe or interpret information in its original context.
Intermediate (I): Degree (non-Honours)
Show feedback
Hide feedback
2. an understanding of the limits of their knowledge
Statement 1. is taken from the descriptor for Honours (H) level and makes the distinction between an awareness of the knowledge of the student and the more advanced concept of knowledge as uncertain and limited.
Honours (H) level: Bachelors degree with Honours
Show feedback
Hide feedback
1. an ability to deploy accurately established techniques of analysis and enquiry within a discipline
Statement 2 is taken from the descriptor for Masters (M) level and apparently represents a distinction between understanding of techniques applicable to the student’s own research and those that are more widely applicable within academic research in general.
Masters (M) level: Masters degree
Show feedback
Hide feedback
1. a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice
Statement 2 is taken from Honours (H) level, where the knowledge gained remains within the student's field of study while the emphasis at Masters level is to gain a broad critical awareness and, in some disciplines, a focus on professional practice.
Doctoral (D): Doctorates
Show feedback
Hide feedback
2. the creation and interpretation of new knowledge, through original research or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, extend the forefront of the discipline, and merit publication
Statement 1. refers to Masters (M) level, which focuses on an understanding of how new knowledge is created and interpreted whereas Doctoral level involves the very creation of new knowledge and advancement of the discipline.
It is worth noting that this framework is intended to be used by course designers and employers (rather than students) and each level uses statements of outcomes (for the course designer) and abilities (of interest to employers). The activity that you have just completed may well have highlighted the degree of abstraction that is present in these descriptors as they are not tied to specific examples from disciplines, courses or assessments. This is left to those designing specific programmes of study for a discipline or field of enquiry.
Download the Portfolio Activity (Word document 31KB) which will help you explore a course you have developed in the context of this framework.
Activity 2: Subject Benchmark statements and Epistemologically Appropriate Practice
“Subject benchmark statements set out expectations about standards of degrees in a range of subject areas. They describe what gives a discipline its coherence and identity, and define what can be expected of a graduate in terms of the abilities and skills needed to develop understanding or competence in the subject.” (QAA Subject Benchmarks)
This activity will explore the academic behaviours that might be expected of students which are implicit in a subject benchmark statement related to your subject area. Some of these may be unfamiliar to international students and there are suggestions of how the various stakeholders in the university could deal with this lack of familiarity.
Instruction
Look at the following commonly used learning methods and for each one consider which are the main areas of potential difficulty for international students.
Choose one or more options.
Show help
Hide help
Notes:
Cultural = relating to customs, expectations, practices specific to the home country
Social = relating to interpersonal relations, acceptance by others, inclusion
Academic = relating to teaching and learning practices
Linguistic = relating to the use and understanding of English, communication with others
Epistemological = relating to the understanding of how knowledge is created/constructed
Lectures
Show feedback
Hide feedback
Linguistic problems are the most likely form of difficulty that international students will have in this context which is probably going to be the most familiar teaching format for them.
Some issues that have been reported have related to the speed of delivery, use of colloquial language, culturally specific examples or references, lack of detail on powerpoint slides, and note-taking.
Some strategies to address this might be:
• To add more detail to powerpoint slides or provide printed/online notes
• To explain the context of examples or use more international examples
• Be mindful of the type of language used – avoid or explain colloquialisms, culturally specific references (these can be a problem among generations as well as nationalities), abbreviations or acronyms
• Offer students advice on strategies for good note-taking.
Seminars
Show feedback
Hide feedback
In the context of seminars it is likely that international students will experience social, linguistic and possibly epistemological difficulties. The style of a seminar is usually more informal than a lecture and this could create issues around student-teacher relationships (calling the lecturer by his/her first name for example). There is often a requirement to contribute to or lead a discussion and this can create problems that are communicative, such as lack of confidence in speaking in front of others and not feeling accepted by the UK students. Student-led seminars will also be challenging in terms of expressing opinions and giving presentations.
Some strategies to address this might be:
• Explaining the function and purpose of the seminar
• Asking students about their prior experiences of learning, especially in respect of discussions and presentations
• Offer opportunities for students to work in pairs
• Varying the assessment (not dependent on just one type of activity, e.g. a presentation).
• Allowing international students to take their turn later in the semester giving them a chance to observe others
• Facilitating out of class opportunities for students to work together e.g. a study group.
Group work
Show feedback
Hide feedback
Here issues are most likely to be cultural, social and academic as students will be obliged to work collaboratively and a variety of issues can arise, e.g. UK students may feel as if they are ‘carrying’ the international students, international students may take longer to tackle research tasks that involve extensive reading.
“We can’t have an in-depth discussion when there are international students in the group. They slow everything down.” (comment from a UK student from Trahar 2007)
“At the beginning, I had no any idea about how to structure the presentation, and I was not sure if we could work it out. But in the process, I found out every member in the group contributed a little bit, this made the work easier and more interesting, just like many calm streams flowed together and become one larger noisy river. Discussion is really a great method to learn, it makes students enjoy learning, it also gives students a chance to communicate, organise and cooperate. All these skills are important for a person’s development in the future.” (International Student, quoted in Burnapp 200?)
Reflective portfolios
Show feedback
Hide feedback
There are likely to be academic, linguistic and/or epistemological issues for students here. This form of learning reflects educational approaches that are based on reflection and autonomy which are not compatible with transmission approaches to teaching and learning such as the lecture. It also requires a more subjective form of expression to that of an academic essay and this will need to be explained to students who may have been taught that academic writing should be objective.
Independent study
Show feedback
Hide feedback
Cultural, academic and epistemological.
Recent studies among UK students prior to entry to higher education have shown that while there is an expectation that greater independence in their learning will be required but that there is still considerable over-estimation of how much contact time there will be.
“…many non-UK postgraduate students are both surprised and disappointed by what they regard as relatively few contact hours in masters degrees.” (Trahar 2007, citing Gil and Katsara 1999).
The area of reading is a particular example of this and it is no less of a problem for international students, indeed it probably presents a greater challenge than for most students as there may be linguistic challenges for some students as well as a lack of understanding of the expectations of lecturers in respect of recommended reading and bibliographies. See (Spack, 1997)Yuko’s story (PowerPoint 72kb)
The Portfolio Activity (Word document 24KB) will help you to explore your own subject area and to examine ways in which international students can be supported in understanding the culture of learning and expectations of your subject area.
Activity 3: Preparing programme specifications
The use of learning outcomes to describe student achievement is a key element of UK Higher Education and it is important that they are effectively linked to appropriate teaching and assessment methods.
This activity will consider programme specifications and how this can be produced in such a way as to fulfill their purpose of providing:
“… a concise description of the intended learning outcomes of an HE programme, and the means by which the outcomes are achieved and demonstrated” (QAA 2006) that is meaningful for both students and educators alike.
Instruction
Consider the learning outcomes below and consider which method/approach may best help students to achieve them.
“Demonstrate an ability to reach reasoned judgements about arguments and evidence based upon sound critical analysis and an understanding of different value positions.”
Show feedback
Hide feedback
Seminar | Individual project | Group work | Student presentation | Problem-based learning
“Intellectual skills such as analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and problem solving may be practised and demonstrated through more active learning processes involving assignments or projects, group-learning activity such as a seminar or tutorial, laboratory, workshop, or field-based activity. Assessment of intellectual skills can utilise unseen written examinations or problem-based exercises. Independent project work or research dissertations are typically used to demonstrate capability in a range of intellectual skills linked to specialist knowledge, understanding and practical skills.” (QAA 2006 p.8)
“Analyse unseen problems and select tools and techniques most suitable for solving them.”
“Practical skills need to be developed through opportunities to practise the activity in an appropriate learning context (eg in laboratory, field, or workplace placement). Workbooks or guidance manuals may also be used to support learning. Assessment of competence in exercising a practical skill must involve practical demonstration of it.” (QAA 2006 p.8)
"Work effectively as an individual and as a member of a team."
Show feedback
Hide feedback
Group work | Work-based learning | Problem-based learning
“Transferable/key skills, that are readily transferable to employment and other contexts, such as communication, teamwork etc can be developed through naturally arising opportunities within the curriculum. For example, written communication skills can be developed and assessed through essays or dissertations; oral communication skills through presentations in seminars; or team working skills through collaborative projects. Skills may be developed also through extra-curricular activities including work experience, student representative work, and social and cultural activities.” (QAA 2006 p.8)
“Demonstrate a broad-based knowledge and understanding of a range of underlying concepts, content, and theoretical perspectives associated with [the subject]."
Show feedback
Hide feedback
“Knowledge and understanding of a subject is often developed through lectures and seminars. Such direct teaching methods are usually supported by directed study of textbooks and journal articles (hard copy or electronic) and by assignment or project work. Knowledge and understanding is often assessed through unseen written examinations, but most if not all assessment methods will require some demonstration of knowledge and understanding.” (QAA 2006 p.8)
Note that the progression of these activities follows the normal sequence of course design:
• to begin by identifying the necessary outcomes for the appropriate level in the framework for higher education qualifications;
• then to establish subject specific benchmarks;
then to prepare the actual programme specifications which describe both the intended learning outcomes of the programme and the ways that these outcomes will be achieved.
The intended outcome of Activity 1 is a demonstration that you can link your work (using an example from a specific subject / field and specific level) to the generic descriptions of the framework for higher education qualifications. It is essential to specify the ‘demonstrable outcomes’ of the particular course you describe.
• Have you shown clearly how one course you are familiar with fits in with the framework for higher education qualifications?
The intended outcome of Activity 2 is a demonstration that you can anticipate potential difficulties related to the expected behaviours in learning within UK Higher Education, that you can think of remedial actions, and can recognise the need to involve other stakeholders.
• Have you shown clearly a distinction between ‘standards’ and ‘methods of learning’?
The intended outcome of Activity 3 is a demonstration that you have identified that the specific methods of delivery your courses use are not culturally neutral and so may require explanation. Each type of course delivery will make different assumptions and involve different skills.
• Have you shown clearly what the delivery methods used on a particular course are, and how these could be made clear to students unfamiliar with these methods?
A Linking Activity (Word document 26.5KB) which synthesises the 3 activities is also available.
References:
Burnapp, D. (2007). EAP: not just English for Academic Purposes but also Epistemologically Appropriate Practice. York: Higher Education Academy:
Trahar, S. (2007). The international higher education landscape - some theories and working practices. Bristol: ESCALATE Education Subject Centre. Available at http://escalate.ac.uk/3559 [accessed 12 July 07].
QAA (2006). Guidelines for preparing programme specifications. QAA. Available at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/programSpec/guidelines06.pdf [accessed 30 November 07].
Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: a longitudinal study. Written Communication, 14(1), 3 - 34