Designing and planning learning activities and programmes of study

Two students working together in a classroom

Students working together

Introduction

The academic experience of most international students in their home countries differs widely from that which they encounter in the UK, and this difference starts to be felt at the base level of course and learning activity design and presentation. The planning and design of courses and learning activities is the first area addressed in the UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education (PDF 167KB), and is the keystone of good academic practice.

These activities will explore the process of course design typically followed in UK universities, and encourage reflection on possible implications of the outcomes of this process on students who are new to this culture of learning.

Each section has a Portfolio Activity associated with it that can be incorporated into a portfolio for personal or assessment purposes. There is also a Linking Activity which synthesises the 3 portfolio activities from each section.

Objectives

• To examine the first area of activity in the UK Professional Standards Framework for teaching and supporting learning in higher education.
• To explore how international students can be introduced to the expectations of new cultures of learning.
• To build up a model of reflective practice concerning support for international students.



Activity 1: The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001

For this activity you will consider the ways in which learning outcomes are used to describe knowledge, understanding and skills (for employment).

Instruction

Look at the tabular representation of the QAA framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland which uses five levels to describe a rising scale of knowledge/understanding and a rising scale of employability qualities. Now consider the knowledge, understanding and abilities that students are typically expected to have at each level and decide which descriptor best fits the level given.

The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001

1 Certificate ------- C level ---- Certificates of Higher Education
2 Intermediate ----- I level ---- Foundation degrees, ordinary (Bachelors) degrees, Diplomas of Higher Education and other higher diplomas
3 Honours ---------- H level ---- Bachelors degrees with Honours, Graduate Certificates and Graduate Diplomas
4 Masters ---------- M level ---- Masters degrees, Postgraduate Certificates and Postgraduate Diplomas
5 Doctoral ---------- D level ---- Doctorates

Certificate (C) level: Certificate of Higher Education



Intermediate (I): Degree (non-Honours)



Honours (H) level: Bachelors degree with Honours



Masters (M) level: Masters degree



Doctoral (D): Doctorates



It is worth noting that this framework is intended to be used by course designers and employers (rather than students) and each level uses statements of outcomes (for the course designer) and abilities (of interest to employers). The activity that you have just completed may well have highlighted the degree of abstraction that is present in these descriptors as they are not tied to specific examples from disciplines, courses or assessments. This is left to those designing specific programmes of study for a discipline or field of enquiry.

Download the Portfolio Activity (Word document 31KB) which will help you explore a course you have developed in the context of this framework.

Download the framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - January 2001 published by the Quality Assurance Agency
www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/FHEQ/EWNI/default.asp

Activity 2: Subject Benchmark statements and Epistemologically Appropriate Practice

“Subject benchmark statements set out expectations about standards of degrees in a range of subject areas. They describe what gives a discipline its coherence and identity, and define what can be expected of a graduate in terms of the abilities and skills needed to develop understanding or competence in the subject.” (QAA Subject Benchmarks)
This activity will explore the academic behaviours that might be expected of students which are implicit in a subject benchmark statement related to your subject area. Some of these may be unfamiliar to international students and there are suggestions of how the various stakeholders in the university could deal with this lack of familiarity.

Instruction

Look at the following commonly used learning methods and for each one consider which are the main areas of potential difficulty for international students.

Choose one or more options.

Show help

Lectures






Seminars






Group work






Reflective portfolios






Independent study






Read a case study (Burnapp 2007) example of a strategy for helping students come to terms with the epistemology of the UK HE context EAP: Not just English for Academic Purposes but also Epistemologically Appropriate Practice (Word document 98KB).

The Portfolio Activity (Word document 24KB) will help you to explore your own subject area and to examine ways in which international students can be supported in understanding the culture of learning and expectations of your subject area.

Activity 3: Preparing programme specifications

The use of learning outcomes to describe student achievement is a key element of UK Higher Education and it is important that they are effectively linked to appropriate teaching and assessment methods.
This activity will consider programme specifications and how this can be produced in such a way as to fulfill their purpose of providing:
“… a concise description of the intended learning outcomes of an HE programme, and the means by which the outcomes are achieved and demonstrated” (QAA 2006) that is meaningful for both students and educators alike.

Instruction

Consider the learning outcomes below and consider which method/approach may best help students to achieve them.

“Demonstrate an ability to reach reasoned judgements about arguments and evidence based upon sound critical analysis and an understanding of different value positions.”









“Analyse unseen problems and select tools and techniques most suitable for solving them.”









"Work effectively as an individual and as a member of a team."









“Demonstrate a broad-based knowledge and understanding of a range of underlying concepts, content, and theoretical perspectives associated with [the subject]."









Read the full guidelines (100KB)

Note that the progression of these activities follows the normal sequence of course design:
• to begin by identifying the necessary outcomes for the appropriate level in the framework for higher education qualifications;
• then to establish subject specific benchmarks;
then to prepare the actual programme specifications which describe both the intended learning outcomes of the programme and the ways that these outcomes will be achieved.

Download Portfolio Activity (Word document 33.5KB)

Would you like to review the main points?

Show review

References:

Burnapp, D. (2007). EAP: not just English for Academic Purposes but also Epistemologically Appropriate Practice. York: Higher Education Academy:

Trahar, S. (2007). The international higher education landscape - some theories and working practices. Bristol: ESCALATE Education Subject Centre. Available at http://escalate.ac.uk/3559 [accessed 12 July 07].

QAA (2006). Guidelines for preparing programme specifications. QAA. Available at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/programSpec/guidelines06.pdf [accessed 30 November 07].

Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: a longitudinal study. Written Communication, 14(1), 3 - 34

© Dave Burnapp, University of Northampton / Alison Dickens, Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, University of Southampton